Austin's Coming Baby Boom

The area where I live in Austin--South Lamar, just a mile from downtown--is undergoing a dramatic transformation. Literally thousands of new apartment units are being built along with new bars, food trailers, and other urban amenities replacing used car lots and fender bender repair shops. Indeed, this construction trend makes sense given the boom in "footloose young singles" moving here. For several years now, Austin has been a top destination for people ages 25-34 moving to a new city. For 2009-2011, we were the 5th top destination (after D.C., Houston, Denver, and Portland), and before that we were #1. Austin also made #5 on the Wall Street Journal's list of cities that will emerge as the hottest destinations after the recession for highly mobile, educated workers in their 20s.

Cities are thinking creatively about ways to attract these young adults. For example, last week I attended a meeting where the topic of discussion was cities' removal of  regulatory barriers to micro apartments--apartments of around 300 square feet--to open up more affordable living options for the young adult set. Along South Lamar, the market is responding to the young adult population boom and corresponding tight rental housing market with the rapid construction of efficiencies and one bedrooms, although not yet at the micro level. Very few of the apartments units will contain two bedrooms, and three bedrooms will likely be non-existent.

Robert Caldaza/Austin-American Statesman

This limited range of bedroom counts and apartment sizes is unfortunate, at both ends of the spectrum. At some point, I hazard a guess that at least half of these young hipsters are going to abandon their footloose tendencies and have children (if they haven't already) and, low and behold, they will no longer want to live in an efficiency apartment. At the same time, they will find a dearth of family-friendly housing options they can afford in the urban core. To retain these new families in Austin (and avoid becoming like San Francisco which has become nearly void of families), Austin needs to figure out how to provide a fuller range of housing types--beyond just efficiency apartments for young single adults--that fit our city's vision for a denser urban form. Otherwise, we will do nothing to contain urban sprawl and will continue to see families fleeing Austin to bedroom communities in surrounding cities along with all their spending power. The suburban cities surrounding Austin have seen far higher rates of population growth than Austin has, fueled in large part by families' demand for more affordable, kid-friendly housing types.

In the coming few weeks I plan to throw some ideas out there on bold steps we could take in Austin to make sure we are not only thinking creatively about how to attract young adults, but also how to retain them as they grow older and have children.

Envisioning the Transformation of South Lamar for Pedestrians and Cyclists

As I reported on Wednesday, transportation experts from the Netherlands met with Austin city planners and residents last week to looks at ways Austin can become more accessible to cyclists of all ages. An update: The presentation from the South Lamar group--which looked at transforming South Lamar Boulevard into a safe, accessible, and attractive corridor for cyclists and pedestrians--is now up on the City's website, along with presentations from the other teams. These are fascinating to review. 

The main issue that the South Lamar team sought to tackle was how to increase transportation capacity along the South Lamar corridor via improvements to the pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, given that the roads are close to being maxed out at certain times in the day (with 35,000 vehicular trips per day and thousands of new apartments coming online). Forty percent of the car trips on South Lamar are for less than 5 miles. If part of these car trips could be converted into trips on foot or bike, then we have a win-win for drivers, neighbors, AND businesses along the corridor. Bad traffic = bad for businesses. Increased pedestrian and bike access = good for business.

Think Bike Presentation from Team Lamar Corridor

Dutch Ideas for Making Austin More Accessible for Cyclists

Last month I blogged about a cycling outing that my son and I took on South Lamar, a major transit corridor here in Austin.  "Scary" and "dangerous" are words that hit the mark in describing what it is like to cycle on South Lamar. Last week a team of Dutch bicycle experts visited Austin and, after riding along the same corridor, agreed with this assessment. The experts, who were here courtesy of the Green Lane Project, ended their visit with a workshop that explored ways to make this corridor less scary and dangerous for cyclists.  Here are some great photos from their ride on South Lamar.

Courtesy of © Renee Renteria Photography

The folks I talked to who attended the workshop were very excited about the Dutch delegation's recommendations for transforming South Lamar into a safe, accessible, and attractive corridor for cyclists and pedestrians. An update from Eileen Nehme, a mother of young kids in one of the adjoining neighborhoods who spent two days with the team:

Cycling the length of South Lamar with Andre Botermans, the Dutch Cycling Embassy representative and urban planner working with our team, was eye opening. In The Netherlands, roads with >10k auto trips per day get bike tracks physically separated from motor traffic. South Lamar has >35K. He was aghast that we would create a bike lane with a stripe of paint on a road as dangerous as South Lamar. . . . The full design includes two-way cycle tracks on both sides of Lamar, which would be shared with pedestrians until the 15' pedestrian zone was completed. These tracks would be separated from motor traffic by a 3-5' planted buffer that serves as a rain garden to filter road runoff. This design preserves the current five motor vehicle lanes (two each way, plus center turn) where room exists. . . . This vision is thrilling to those of us who want to address the exploding transportation demands on South Lamar and be able to bike safely to Wheatsville or Target. Making cycling a viable and significant transportation mode is essential to Austin's future.

Ideas from the Think Bike workshop on transforming South Lamar into a cycling-friendly transit corridor 

Child-Friendly Public Art III

"Gift : Unknown Pocket 2" by Toshiko Horiuchi, 2009
© Sizuken, available under a Creative Commons Attribution/noncommercial/sharealike license

As a follow-up to last week's posts, more ideas coming in from parents on what makes public art child-friendly and some fun pictures I found on Flikr:

The most important item is to be able to touch, climb, hands on interaction. I cringe when I see the do not touch, do not climb, etc. signs.  Kids enjoy just walking on curbs and benches in a row. It doesn't have to be fancy. Don't program too much. Green open space to play is key. The best art is good for all ages. I think something that falls into kid or not kid has failed. A top notch designer will make it work for both. Don't forget shade! Personally I prefer trees.   

A sustainable interactive sculpture park generated by solar, wind, and rainwater collection.  Instruments move based on natural resources.  A kite sculpture that moves with wind but where kids can shift movement patterns by levers.  This ties into our annual kite festival. Also, we are bike-friendly city (or trying to be).  Could make a bike sculpture garden with tandem bikes that don't move but wheels turn (but are covered/protected so little fingers and hands can't get in).

We were in Minneapolis this summer and kids and all kinds of people love these outdoor sculpture gardens. They have picnic venders and weekend activities in that space. Iconic tourist destination that is welcoming and high concept. 

I think "tactile" and "interactive" art captures kids attention. 

LOVE Sculpture in Tokyo
© RageZ, available under a Creative Commons Attribution license

Child-friendly art:

• Is stupendously large to them.

• Is made to climb on or touch.

• Is designed to walk around, under or through to get different perspectives and promote discovery.

• Is friendly or kind in spirit, appears to be looking at you, inviting you or celebrating ... or has a story the adults can relate to.

• Is designed to improve with time, weathering and patina, not wear out.

• Is multi-sensory, with texture, visual sparkle/depth, sound or movement.

• Is designed into the surrounding environment with human-friendly features like shade, breezes, benches for tired parents, low walls, trees, or ponds, all of which are also designed for lounging, touching and climbing. 

Children's Landscape Park in Kyiv, Ukraine
© Anosmia, available under a Creative Commons Attribution license

© louisemakestuff available under a Creative Commons Attribution/noncommercial/sharealike license

Children's Landscape Park in Kyiv, Ukraine
© Anosmia, available under a Creative Commons Attribution license

Children's Landscape Park in Kyiv, Ukraine
© Anosmia, available under a Creative Commons Attribution license

More on What Makes Public Art Child-Friendly?

Yesterday I posed a question on this blog about what makes public art child-friendly. Since then, I've received lots of great responses on this via email from parents. Here are some of their thoughts. I will post more of their responses later this week.

My kids want to climb everything -- so I'd want art that they are either invited to climb OR at least be sure it's something that doesn't invite climbing.  It's just awful when there is some sculpture that is practically begging a kid to climb it next to a sign forbidding it.  Or worse -- at the capitol there are guards there to keep kids from having fun. I think interaction is key.  They love goofing around in front of those wacky mirrors that make you look taller or fatter.  They love ringing giant chimes.  They like it if they can fit inside it or hide behind it.  They love the big, lighted disco dance floor in front of The Long Center.  They love garden paths that lead to leafy "secret hide-outs".  They like the giant terrazzo maps at the airport.  They like the big fruit/veggie bollards in front of Central Market.  They love mosaics -- discovering little details stuck into the design.  They also LOVE things they got to help create or that were obviously created in part by other children.

It doesn't have to be "kid art".  It shouldn't look like Romper Room.  It just needs to be unexpected and OK to touch.  It's not like they'll only like it if it's primary colors.  In fact, I think that's pretty condescending.  They kind of dig the manipulation of nature type of art exhibits -- the Andy Goldsworthy type stuff.  They enjoy the maze out at The Natural Gardener.

Here's one I really like where the public can alter the piece. 

My two criteria are that kids can touch and climb on the art. My kids love to climb on the statue "philosophers rock" at Barton Springs. It's not really kid friendly because it says you should not crawl on it and it's made of bronze which heats up like crazy in summer, but they love to try anyway.

Philosophers Rock at Barton Springs in Austin

I think interactive sculptures really capture kids attention -- like the Dell Children's hospital art.  Interactive water features are also great -- push a button & water shoots out.  Also, musical features are always a huge hit with kids -- they like to make noise. Murals are great and kids like things they can look through, like the painted body & they put there head or face through and get a picture taken.  They like telescopes.

Dell Children's Hospital

Interactive art-either that kids can climb on or 'play' like an instrument-really engages my kids! Or also they LOVED the one at Dell childrens, the balls when you first come in the door. That appeals to all ages.

In my experience and travels, child-friendly art is interactive and touch-able.  Sculptures, fountains, anything reflective, climb-able, touch-able, etc.  We go to Denver a couple of times each year.  Our go-to is the science museum and the zoo.  Both have great sculptures that kids can climb on and run around.  In San Francisco, both the California Academy of Sciences and the DeYoung Museum are great examples. There is a fabulous, open plaza connecting the two museums.  DeYoung has an amazing sculpture garden.  The kids can't climb on the sculptures (it's "art"!), but they spent a solid hour running around them, hiding amongst them, making up stories based on the sculptures' names, etc.  Plus, there were installations/designs in the stone work leading up to the museum.  It fosters conversations and play.  My favorite child-friendly art isn't even art per se. 

Asheville, North Carolina

Breckenridge, Colorado

Breckenridge, Colorado

What Makes Public Art Child-Friendly?

I attended a meeting with City of Austin staff yesterday to talk about what it means for public art to be child-friendly. The City is commissioning "child-friendly" public art to be placed just outside the new downtown library. What is a good definition for "child-friendly" public art? What are the key elements that distinguish child-friendly from non-child-friendly public art?   

Here are some of my thoughts. What are yours? 

• Child-friendly art captures a child’s attention and draws them in
• Child-friendly art allows for physical exploration (kids love to touch things and climb!)
• Child-friendly art engages a child's imagination and sense of wonderment
• Child-friendly art, if it is great public art, is loved by people of all ages, young and old

Austin's "Play Me, I'm Yours" interactive art exhibit

Pearl District in Portland

Dallas

Seattle

Dallas

Paris

Great Parks: Examples from Paris

Market studies have established that when families with children are deciding where to live, one of their top priorities is access to quality parks. But when it comes to providing this access, Austin has a long ways to go: Only 47% of the city's population lives within walking distance to a park, and the city is even struggling with maintaining its existing parks. In a recent survey, Austin families cited the lack of child-friendly open space as one of their top concerns about the City and its ability to support the needs of families and children.

Over the next decade, to attract and retain families with children in the city, Austin needs to tackle two challenges with its parks system: access and quality. The City needs to figure out how to join the ranks of cities like Chicago, Seattle, Denver, and Minneapolis in ensuring that the bulk of its population has walking access to a park, and, at the same time, the City needs ensure that its parks are high quality and attractive to children and persons of all ages.

One of the greatest park systems my family has ever come across in our travels is in Paris. The Project for Public Places even ranked 4 of Paris's parks amongst the top 24 in the world. This past summer my family, including our 2-year-old nephew, had the opportunity to visit several of Paris's marvelous and magical parks. Indeed, it seemed that every 1/2 mile or so in our travels throughout the City we would come across a fabulous, engaging, one-of-a-kind park. Here are some pictures from our trip:

Jardin des Tuileries, Paris

Jardin des Tuileries, Paris

Parc de la Villette

Parc de la Villette

Parc de la Villette

Jardin d'Acclimation

Jardin d'Acclimation

Jardin d'Acclimation

Jardin d'Acclimation

Place des Vosges

Parc de la Villette